For delivery partners

A practical partner pack for suitable Microsoft delivery opportunities

Four short, reusable assets explaining where Solvanto fits, how delivery works, and what to look for before introducing an opportunity.

Use the discovery checklist

Partner-ready by design

Clear boundaries, discreet delivery, proportionate documentation, and respect for the partner's client relationship.

No named clients or confidential histories

No inflated claims or unnecessary enterprise bloat

No hidden subcontracting or unclear ownership

Asset 01

One-page capability sheet

Solvanto provides hands-on Microsoft delivery for operational problems that need focused technical depth, clear ownership, and a supportable result.

What Solvanto does

Discovers and simplifies operational processes before choosing technology.
Builds practical solutions across Azure, Power Platform, Power Apps, Power Automate, integration, data, and reporting.
Improves or connects existing systems when replacement would add needless cost or risk.
Includes testing, security, monitoring, documentation, handover, and maintainability in delivery.

Where Solvanto complements partners

Adds specialist delivery capacity behind a partner-led client relationship.
Supports discovery, solution shaping, technical assurance, rescue work, or end-to-end implementation.
Bridges operational needs and technical execution without layers of account-management hand-off.
Works discreetly alongside consultancies, managed service providers, and internal delivery teams.

What Solvanto does not do

Pretend to be a large consultancy, product vendor, or 24/7 managed-service desk.
Displace the introducing partner or approach its client outside agreed boundaries.
Force a platform or full replacement where a smaller change is the better answer.
Accept work without enough access, ownership, or clarity to deliver responsibly.

Asset 02

Three anonymised delivery examples

The details below are deliberately generalised. They show problem, intervention, and operational result without exposing client identities, confidential implementation detail, or employment history.

Example 1

Replacing a spreadsheet-and-inbox workflow

Problem: Requests were captured in inconsistent spreadsheets, approved through email, and chased manually. Teams could not see a dependable current status or audit trail.
Intervention: The process was simplified, then moved into a structured Microsoft-based workflow with clear fields, validation, role-based access, notifications, approval history, and support documentation.
Operational result: Teams had one place to manage the work, fewer manual hand-offs, clearer ownership, and a reliable record of decisions and progress.

Example 2

Making system-to-system processing supportable

Problem: Operational data moved between disconnected systems through manual exports and fragile workarounds. Failures were difficult to spot and time-consuming to investigate.
Intervention: The end-to-end flow was mapped and replaced with a focused integration pattern covering validation, transformation, safe retries, exception handling, monitoring, and handover.
Operational result: Routine data movement became more consistent, exceptions were visible earlier, and support teams had clearer information and ownership when intervention was needed.

Example 3

Improving trust in operational reporting

Problem: Reports were assembled from inconsistent sources and manual transformations, so users spent time checking the numbers before acting on them.
Intervention: Measures and ownership were agreed, source-to-report data flows were simplified, and validation, transformation, monitoring, and documentation were made explicit.
Operational result: Reporting became easier to understand and support, with more dependable inputs, faster investigation of issues, and clearer accountability for data quality.

Asset 03

Working-together sheet

The practical defaults below give both parties a clear starting point. Project-specific contracts and client requirements take precedence once agreed.

Confidentiality

Information is used only for the agreed opportunity or delivery. Mutual NDAs and client-specific security requirements can be accommodated before sensitive detail is shared.

Client ownership

The introducing partner's client relationship is respected. Roles, account ownership, meeting participation, and contact boundaries are agreed before engagement begins.

Communication

A named lead, agreed meeting rhythm, concise status updates, and early escalation keep the partner informed without creating unnecessary delivery overhead.

Documentation

Decisions, assumptions, designs, testing, operational guidance, and handover material are documented in proportion to the work and stored where the agreed team can access them.

Subcontracting

No additional subcontractor is introduced without prior agreement. Any approved contributor follows the same confidentiality, security, quality, and client-contact expectations.

Commercial options

Engagements can be structured as fixed-scope delivery, time-based specialist support, or an agreed block of capacity. Scope, assumptions, dependencies, rates, and change control are confirmed in writing.

Asset 04

Partner discovery checklist

If most answers are yes, the opportunity is likely worth a short joint discovery conversation. A no does not always rule it out, but it usually identifies the next question to resolve.

1Is there a clear operational problem rather than only a preferred technology?
2Does the process rely on spreadsheets, inboxes, duplicate entry, manual checks, or repeated chasing?
3Are systems disconnected, or is important data moving unreliably between them?
4Do users lack a trustworthy view of status, ownership, exceptions, or performance?
5Is the work a good fit for Azure, Power Platform, Power Apps, Power Automate, integration, data, or reporting?
6Is there a named business owner who can explain the process and make decisions?
7Can the partner and client provide access to the right users, systems, security contacts, and technical information?
8Is there a useful first phase that can deliver value without committing to a large transformation?
9Have licensing, data sensitivity, support ownership, and handover expectations been raised early?
10Is the desired outcome concrete enough to test after delivery?

Have a possible fit?

Share the operational problem, current systems, likely stakeholders, and desired outcome. Solvanto can help determine whether a focused discovery or delivery engagement makes sense.

Send an opportunity